They’re called ‘Tattooers’: A Review of Tattoo Style

On my way to work today I popped into WHSmith to see if there was anything worth reading. Around the usual crap I saw one of these funny little “magbook” things- “magbooks”, or “bookazines”, are basically mini-books that are more like in-depth magazines than anything else. Anyway, this one is called Tattoo Style, and it’s by the makers of Bizarre Magazine.

The cover looks very nice, but as soon as you open it up you see an advert for New Image, a supply company responsible for inspiring a fair few ‘scratchers’ with one of their old websites. Not really a good start, to be honest! I persevered, which you would too if you’d just spent £7 on the thing.

Thankfully the whole thing gets better, with a foreword by Jesse Smith, which is ridiculously cool and very well thought out. After this, the format of the book is pretty simple: they’ve picked out some ‘styles’ of tattooing, and a main tattooer to highlight each one, then added in additional photos for each section.

I have to use the word ‘styles’ a little loosely, I’m afraid- I personally don’t see ‘animals’ and ‘pin ups’ as a style, I’d consider that a subject matter. Unfortunately, the styles are a little lacking, in my opinion. ‘Traditional’ becomes ‘Old School’, and there is nothing there for colour realism or new school, which I saw as a little strange. I think the makers of this must be confused too, since some of their ‘old school’ tattoos really aren’t anything of the sort, and I don’t think a magpie qualifies as ‘horror’.

My pet hate about this thing is the fact they use the word ‘inker’ a lot, instead of tattooer. I’m sorry, can we just clear this up now for a second? ‘Ink’, ‘inked’, ‘inker’… they’re not cool words. Just call them motherfucking tattoos, tattoos are cool enough. You sound like you’re going through a mid-life crisis if you say anything else.


I digest. Have you seen the tattooers who are in this thing?! Joining Jesse Smith are the almighty Uncle Allan, Joe Capobianco, Angelique Houtkamp, Paul Booth and Mike Devries, among other amazing tattooers. The work shown in this is actually outstanding. There’s only one bad tattoo in this whole thing (you’ll know when you see it), and the things these tattooers have to say is pretty cool, too. Where the makers of this have failed in some areas, they’ve really made up for in picking out some amazing tattooers to be in this.

The tattooers featured in this “magbook” make it worth buying, to be honest with you. Their work is outstanding, as usual, and it actually feels kind of nice to hold in your hands, instead of drooling over the artists’ blogs online. I think tattooers will like this as well, for one of those “these are the sorts of styles you can get” talks with customers. I really liked reading about what some of these guys had to say as well, especially when it came to their overall attitudes and the reasons why they work in the ways they do.

Overall, I think Tattoo Style is worth the £7, however, for another extra quid you can buy a marker pen and go over everything which isn’t from one of the tattoo artists, to make it better. And scrub out the word ‘inker’.

Tattoo Style is available now from WHSmith, and websites like this one. You can also click here and see a small snippet of what’s inside.

4 Responses to “They’re called ‘Tattooers’: A Review of Tattoo Style”
  1. flora amalie says:

    Inside scoop: you should have seen the first draft. Every time Allan said “tattoo” or “tattooing” they’d changed it to “ink” or “inking”, thus making him sound like kind of a tool (which he is not).
    We had to explain that tattooers don’t talk like that! They meant well, it’s just that most people actually think it sounds cool.
    Too bad about that supply company, had we known about that we might not have agreed to do this, but whatever!

    • Mel Noir says:

      I fucking knew it! I was reading that thing thinking to myself “these tattooers are talking like this as well, that is so weird”, and I was convinced that wasn’t what they said. They make themselves sound like a load of 13 year olds who watched LA Ink.

      I didn’t want to make you guys feel a bit crap about being in it with the supply company, but what’s done is done- like you say, whatever! Like I said, it’s still a good read, purely for people like Allan and what they had to say.

      To be honest, I read an article in Bizarre about this the other day, and a lot of it was lifted from the book, which made it look like it was okay for idiots to imitate tattooer’s work. If I realised at the time it was promoting this book, I don’t know if I would have bought it. Hey, at least I have some great tattooer’s work to look at next time my internet gets cut off! :)

      Thanks for that little inside scoop, you guys rule ;) x

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

  • All content (C) Tattoosday UK unless otherwise stated. .
%d bloggers like this: